Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 01:03:46 +0100 From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: nathan@rtfm.net Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: O_SYNC Message-ID: <12424.910656226@verdi.nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 9 Nov 1998 18:56:38 -0500" References: <19981109185638.B8871@rtfm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Yes, however every other OS defines it at "O_SYNC" why are we different? > > or, if there is a reason, why isn't there a compatibility #define? > > > > can someone check this on netbsd/open bsd/os ? is it bsd or us? > > NetBSD 1.3.2: > fcntl.h:92:#define O_SYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ > fcntl.h:127:#define FFSYNC O_SYNC /* kernel */ > fcntl.h:129:#define O_FSYNC O_SYNC /* compat */ BSD/OS 3.1 fcntl.h: #define O_FSYNC 0x0080 /* synchronous writes */ #define FFSYNC O_FSYNC /* kernel */ Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12424.910656226>