Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 20:26:44 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: fenner@research.att.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Keeping using locally modified source Message-ID: <200003060426.UAA85867@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <200003042205.OAA13663@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200003030059.TAA29567@rac4.wam.umd.edu> <5laekg8h44.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <200003031102.DAA09390@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <200003042205.OAA13663@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200003042205.OAA13663@windsor.research.att.com>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> wrote: > > I've got this program in my head that takes a CVS tree and turns it > into a branch ofanother CVS tree (e.g. FreeBSD rev 1.7 turns into > rev 1.1.1.7) but it's never managed to make it out of my head, so > it must be harder than I keep thinking it is =) I've had the same idea for CVSup for quite awhile but haven't gotten around to implementing it. It would be a new "import mode" where the updates you fetched were "imported" onto the vendor branch of your local repository. It would be great for maintaining local modifications. I've been thinking about it for a long time and haven't found a reason yet why it wouldn't work. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003060426.UAA85867>