From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 6 15: 9:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C38637BB2B; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 15:09:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA56081; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:09:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA88816; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:09:04 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003062309.QAA88816@harmony.village.org> To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS Cc: "James E. Pace" , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2000 14:55:05 PST." References: Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:09:04 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Kris Kennaway writes: : On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: : : > Sure. Here's what I have in my uncommitted tree. It assumes that you : > have socks installed already. Known to work with the nec port, not : > known one way or the other on dante. : > : > Oh, there's lots of warnings from this, but it does work. : : I'd like to get this committed - I'll try and take a look at it tonight, : time permitting. I would definitely like to allow SSH to work with dante, : though, since that's a better (BSDL) alternative than the restricted NEC : version. Mark M has seen these patches and has asked that I hold off until after the freeze to commit them. At this point, I'm inclined to agree with him. They definitely do not work with Dante, because dante doesn't seem to install any header files, like the nec socks5 port does. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message