From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 14 18:09:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B1016A4D0 for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 18:09:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34EC743D3F for ; Sat, 14 May 2005 18:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO 172.16.0.1) (mikej@69.193.222.195 with login) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 May 2005 18:09:40 -0000 Received: from 172.16.0.199 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej) by 172.16.0.1 with HTTP; Sat, 14 May 2005 14:09:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4603.172.16.0.199.1116094186.squirrel@172.16.0.1> In-Reply-To: <4285836E.3AD4B37@freebsd.org> References: <20050505133250.GA73885@us.svf.stuba.sk> <20050506065950.GA1999@us.svf.stuba.sk> <20050507043712.GB28373@xor.obsecurity.org> <1318.172.16.0.199.1115846681.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <1424.172.16.0.199.1115851128.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050512072754.GB92476@us.svf.stuba.sk> <3973.172.16.0.199.1116028322.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <4285836E.3AD4B37@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 14:09:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Andre Oppermann" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Marian Durkovic Subject: Re: Outgoing speed problems in -CURRENT (was: Re: SOLVED: Degraded TCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:09:41 -0000 On Sat, May 14, 2005 12:49 am, Andre Oppermann said: > Mike Jakubik wrote: >> I just tried your patch, but unfortunately it does not seem to affect >> my problem, the speeds are identical. I am still getting half the >> performance when sending out. The fact that this also occurs using >> another machine and a different card, leads me to belive something is >> broken in -CURRENT. > > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 and try again. Im sorry, i mean to say receiving, not sending. I did try adjusting this, but it made no difference. Just to recap: netio server running windows xp, connecting from fbsd: TCP/IP connection established. Packet size 1 KByte: 41103 KByte/s Packet size 2 KByte: 39601 KByte/s Packet size 4 KByte: 43463 KByte/s Packet size 8 KByte: 43734 KByte/s Packet size 16 KByte: 43719 KByte/s Packet size 32 KByte: 43656 KByte/s netio server running on fbsd, connecting from windows xp: TCP/IP connection established. Packet size 1 KByte: 19347 KByte/s Packet size 2 KByte: 21056 KByte/s Packet size 4 KByte: 22845 KByte/s Packet size 8 KByte: 23445 KByte/s Packet size 16 KByte: 25082 KByte/s Packet size 32 KByte: 25294 KByte/s So as we can see, i am getting nearly half the performance when sending to the fbsd server. I get simillar results when substituting the windows server with a fbsd 5.4 server, and using 100mbit cards on both.