Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:26:40 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: g@sh4-5.1blu.de, cy@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports && 10-CURRENT Message-ID: <201306191926.r5JJQe8A079087@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:15:28 %2B0200." <20130619141527.GA25228@sh4-5.1blu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20130619141527.GA25228=40sh4-5.1blu.de>, Matthias Apitz write= s: > El d=EDa Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert e= scribi=F3: >=20 > > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but peo= ple do > =20 > > not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes wi= th=20 > > it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate=20 > > x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to= use=20 > > devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not= .=20 > > There's no reason to install more software just to build other softwa= re if=20 > > we don't need it. It's extra baggage. >=20 > I keep thinking, that _if_ there is already installed an imake, net/vnc= > should make use of it and not try to build its own one; and most of the= > users of net/vnc will have installed an X server before; Agreed. I doubt devel/imake would be any more successful though. I haven't looked= =20 at it closely (less than a couple of minutes, so I may be wrong) but I=20 believe that OSMajorVersion may not be defined properly under 10. --=20 Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert=40komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy=40FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201306191926.r5JJQe8A079087>