From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 14:52:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98F81065673 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA19C8FC22 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239]) by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id F405F2798B8; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:52:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8ED3E17051; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +0100 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan To: Gabe Message-ID: <20081212145300.GA14254@zeninc.net> References: <20081212135124.115368FC24@mx1.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081212135124.115368FC24@mx1.freebsd.org> User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less. Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: NAT-T + ipsec integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:52:23 -0000 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 05:51:31AM -0800, Gabe wrote: > So far so good... Should I be worried that the patch file names have 'test' in them? I can rename them if you want ;-) Patch for FreeBSD6 is stable enough to be used in production and to survive non regression test suite at NETASQ. Patch for FreeBSD7 is used by many people AFAIK, including my own IPsec gates which have tunnels up 24h/7. I called those versions "test" when I put them online because I only checked that they compile before releasing them. They have been much more tested since. Yvan.