From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 5 07:34:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7F6F1 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 07:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28542194 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2013 07:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-127-6.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.127.6]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2013 17:04:43 +0930 Message-ID: <524FC111.1050106@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 17:04:41 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130516 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build failure for 9.2-RELEASE References: <34.60.16944.9502D425@cdptpa-oedge02> In-Reply-To: <34.60.16944.9502D425@cdptpa-oedge02> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 07:34:46 -0000 On 03/10/2013 17:14, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I failed with "make buildworld" on 9.2, building from a 9.2 > prerelease. > > svn revision on system to be built was 255986. > > uname -a shows > > FreeBSD amelia2 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #17 r254196: > Sun Aug 11 00:36:49 UTC 2013 > root@amelia2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY amd64 PRERELEASE would be from stable/9 - RELEASE from releng/9.2 Did you svn up on the stable branch or checkout releng/9.2? > I had MODULES_WITH_WORLD=yes in /etc/make.conf to avoid the > redundancy and annoyance of rebuilding modules every time I build a > new kernel, like if I want a more portable kernel (for a USB-stick > install) as well as my custom kernel. > > Point of failure seemed to be in module dtrace. > > I have in kernel config > > #options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled > in #options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks > > Maybe I need to reenable these? The 9.2 release notes says "DTrace hooks have been enabled by default in the GENERIC kernel" so they should already be enabled.