Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 14:20:04 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) Cc: terry@lambert.org, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, jhs@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, commercial@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Licensing Software Message-ID: <199609252120.OAA06792@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <9609252041.AA25068@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett Wollman" at Sep 25, 96 04:41:18 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > IPv6 solves this problem by making my address ranges independent of > > my ISP/NSP: > > No, wrong. That is precisely what it does not do. The IPv6 > addressing plan (as it stands) is designed to provide for > provider-oriented addresses /only/. To speak of some other sort of > identifier as an ``address'' is in fact nonsense. An address tells > you how to get there; it does not identify an object. Sounds like I can no longer have a transiently connected subnet. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609252120.OAA06792>