Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 16:46:55 +0500 (GMT) From: CyberPsychotic <fygrave@tigerteam.net> To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech@openbsd.org Subject: Re: io ports reading/writing Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905051641490.632-100000@kyrnet.kg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905050742530.43394-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
~ > ~ > I don't quite understand the i386 architecture at this level but I seem to ~ > remember that this support would require significant changes in the way we ~ > handle processes and there might have been some performance implications. ~ > I don't think its a big problem in practice. ~ ~ What about i386_[gs]et_ioperm()? ~ is it documented anywhere? `find /usr/share/man -name '*386*'' showed me only manual page for i386_[gs]et_ldt which is a different thing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.05.9905051641490.632-100000>