Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:20:52 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: inpcb/inpcbinfo rwlocking: coming to a 7-STABLE branch near you Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808121119040.86332@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <200808120059.m7C0xvUH028011@lava.sentex.ca> References: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808031142550.65130@fledge.watson.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808082219360.16028@fledge.watson.org> <200808120059.m7C0xvUH028011@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 05:21 PM 8/8/2008, Robert Watson wrote: > >> http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20080808-7stable-rwlock-inpcb.diff >> >> These incude the inpcb/inpcbinfo read/write locking changes (although not >> yet for raw/divert sockets). Any testing, especially with heavy UDP loads, >> would be much appreciated -- this are fairly complex changes, and also >> quite a complex MFC. > > So far so good with the patches. I am running them on a busy sendmail > server that also does a lot of DNS locally for itself and a number of other > boxes. Excellent news. I have a couple of other reviews and hopefully some more testing coming in, and will commit in a few days if all continues to go well. An updated version of the patch is here: http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20080811-7stable-rwlock-inpcb.diff There are no changes from previous versions, but I was asked to regenerate the patch with function names, so have done so. Anyone out there running name servers, NFS over UDP, and other UDP workloads: your testing of this patch prior to commit would be much appreciated. Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.10.0808121119040.86332>