Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:55:14 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal for another category in INDEX: common_deps Message-ID: <46A05C52.20205@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <46A05B21.90603@u.washington.edu> References: <46A05B21.90603@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello porters, > Currently in the INDEX files there are 13 categories describing > dependencies, 2 of which are: > > 8. build_deps > 9. run_deps > > I just ran a quick analysis with a Perl script and found that there > are a number of similarities in the build_deps and run_deps fields in > the INDEX files -- so many that I think that items common to both > build_deps and run_deps should be isolated and put into a new category > called 'common_deps': > I've posted my results to > <http://students.washington.edu/youshi10/posted/INDEX-analysis-part2.log>, > and I've posted my script at: > <http://soc2007-freebsd-project-hosting.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/field_analyzer.pl>. > > Questions and comments are more than welcome. > Thanks, > -Garrett Oh yes, you run field_analyzer.pl like so: #!/bin/sh for i in 5 6 7; do ./field_analyzer.pl < /path/to/INDEX-$i > /path/to/field_analysis-$i.log done This only works with Bourne compatible shells [redirecting input in and out doesn't work for (t)csh] of course. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A05C52.20205>