Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:52:48 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dougb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction. Message-ID: <CADLo83_47PPrKGGhsr48-7D6BrD%2BjzM0HRwmQtES3G=5jSqroA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net> References: <20120323154105.GB84340@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Mar 2012 15:41, "Jason Hellenthal" <jhellenthal@dataix.net> wrote: > > > Hey Doug, > > Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening > ? > > If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use > bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) from source it > attempts to remove empty directories from /etc/named/*. When doing this > it can only remove empty directories and since master & slave usually > will have something in it on most systems dynamic gets removed but left > to be re-created from /etc/rc.d/named on the next boot. > > Do you think it would be possible to "for say" create a > USING_BIND_FROM_PORTS make.conf var that could be compared during the > (make delete-old) stage so it does not attempt to do anything with > /etc/named/* ? but yet still allow it to operate on the rest of the > stale files. > Would it be too hackish to have a file .keepme in the dynamic directory? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_47PPrKGGhsr48-7D6BrD%2BjzM0HRwmQtES3G=5jSqroA>