Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 21:19:21 +0100 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org, Brad Davis <brd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: anoncvs.. offer Message-ID: <CAC8HS2GJ7AHRtQ=2a1%2Bg81DmHELzte_JLJR2_KWkpbPOrJ-Q-A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FC911CF.10402@freebsd.org> References: <4FC8C070.3000008@freebsd.org> <4FC911CF.10402@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> wrote: > tabthorpe@ suggested that I send this to you (I guess it makes sense, > portmgr is only ports ;-) Hey, Yes, hubs is probably the best place. > I am currently running a (semi public) tinderbox at lorie.secnap.net. > It is in our secure data center, 100Mbs fiber, battery and generator > backup, takes three different permissions on card key to get in (only > two people have those permissions). > Pretty secure, (we are a managed network security company), staffed 24/7. > > I noticed that the ports anon cvs is broken in us (heard its broken > everywhere except tw and fr). > > I would volunteer a jailed public anoncvs.us.FreeBSD.org /and/or > anoncvs1.FreeBSD.org. If somebody is willing to run an external anoncvs, I would be very happy with this. See any problems with this brd (who have run a mirror in the past)? Is it running now? Do you plan to run it over pserver or ssh? > since we are moving everything to svn, I would volunteer to host that. > No sense in cvs just for ports at this point. Not sure what you mean by this part - for svn the anon access is pretty much built in? > ps, video of our SOC:<https://vimeo.com/40589546>; Hmm, you guys use pie charts in network monitoring? ;-) -- Simon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAC8HS2GJ7AHRtQ=2a1%2Bg81DmHELzte_JLJR2_KWkpbPOrJ-Q-A>