From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 29 14:56:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E60037B404 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0TMrfr12495; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:53:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Dominic Marks , Tony Finch , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD-1.X public cvs? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:22 MST." <15447.10030.902189.861421@caddis.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <12493.1012344821@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <15447.10030.902189.861421@caddis.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams write s: >> Caldera's License Agreement: >> >> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf > >Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It >implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it doesn't give explicit >release of said source code. Well, I have never heard claims that BSD was tainted by any USL release besides 32V, so this is good enough for me to put my 1.X tree up without fearing ugly lawyers. Now, where did all those CD's go... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message