Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:11:55 +0200
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>
To:        Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        GrimJow Espada <grimjow.espada@gmail.com>, Saifi Khan <saifi.khan@twincling.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: hi
Message-ID:  <87prh9ku9g.fsf@kobe.laptop>
In-Reply-To: <20090223081921.V71718@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:19:30 %2B0100 (CET)")
References:  <9ef7e7380902220154t74657d52uc9497c77672b79f8@mail.gmail.com> <9a52b1190902220711u65e38320t97ca56547bef246d@mail.gmail.com> <87ljryccm0.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20090223081921.V71718@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:19:30 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>> mini-guide for checking out the ports before their removal and building
>> them as local ports.
>>
>> The source for these ports is no longer maintained, and they may pose a
>> security risk if you use them on multi-user machines --- especially if
>> untrusted users have local shell access --- but if you want to shoot
>> your foot, the Ports tree already provides gun & ammo to do that :-)
>
> alpine works fine

I know.  That's why I am not in favor of maintaining pine4 *in* the
Ports tree.  If someone wants to blow their foot off, however, then it's
fine with me, as long as they know what they are doing when they point
the "cvs update" gun backwards in time :)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87prh9ku9g.fsf>