Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:33:38 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/perl Makefile 
Message-ID:  <200008112233.QAA90517@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Aug 2000 14:26:30 PDT." <39946F86.62F0B165@cup.hp.com> 
References:  <39946F86.62F0B165@cup.hp.com>  <399458F3.15AC1DE@cup.hp.com> <200008111935.NAA36773@harmony.village.org> <20000811152305.C12290@netmonger.net> <20000811144136.A12290@netmonger.net> <20000811141800.A14610@netmonger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008111426270.98390-100000@pawn.primelocation.net> <20000811144136.A12290@netmonger.net> <200008111857.MAA36439@harmony.village.org> <200008111940.NAA44776@harmony.village.org> <200008111955.NAA68299@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39946F86.62F0B165@cup.hp.com> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: [committers removed from CC]

Thank you.

: As mentioned in another mail; the wrapper could look at the mods to
: determine that. I think it should *not* run the sperl if the mods don't
: have suid. Instead, a message could be given that explains why sperl is
: not being run. That message could be as verbose as we think is
: reasonable to explain to the unexpected user why his script isn't
: running as he/she might be used to.
: 
: That way we have wrapped the sperl bug of not having the suid bit set
: into a package that, as a whole, isn't really a bug anymore and can only
: be slightly inconvenient to those users that have suid perl scripts.

If the internal checks in sperl will allow this, then this might be
the best way to go.  I want to think about this a little before doing
that.  Peter shot down other wrappers for these.

The good news is that my mods to install it mode 0 seem to work.  I'm
not going to commit anything until we can get consensus on what to do.

And I honestly thought this would be an uncontroversial change.
That's what I get for thinking. :-(

Warer


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008112233.QAA90517>