From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 25 20:37:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA02407 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:37:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from artemis.syncom.net (artemis.syncom.net [206.64.31.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02399; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:37:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cyouse@artemis.syncom.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by artemis.syncom.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA04719; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:45:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Youse To: Brian Feldman cc: Gary Palmer , Paul Richards , "'Philippe Regnauld'" , Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Threads across processors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Brian Feldman wrote: > The SPARC port's not dead? I've been trying to get my hands on an UltraSPARC board to work on the port, but I'm experiencing a cashflow problem. :) I decided to start with the older sun architectures (i.e., sun4m), but I discovered that the differences between sun4m and sun4u are sufficient enough to make that a waste of time. Chuck Youse cyouse@syncom.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message