Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Dec 2015 06:25:08 +0100
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        Anton Sayetsky <vsasjason@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Migrating to FreeBSD from Debian
Message-ID:  <20151208062508.31ae2ec2.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAA2O=b-dQMpnq=nJ6RMSvwBCa4kP4PB2k4c7nbTVrwtQkzStBg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAO-kBwffucnPVphm_ajbtAejjFiAv_Cp+v7jZ-xCTX7YTqk36w@mail.gmail.com> <86poyiuynx.fsf@gmail.com> <CAA2O=b_p-HPx+pPyFOgJMe02d5xrJe_aXJ8ZG9z+dHZCNwh91Q@mail.gmail.com> <56659FC8.8020904@FreeBSD.org> <CAA2O=b-dQMpnq=nJ6RMSvwBCa4kP4PB2k4c7nbTVrwtQkzStBg@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:10:00 +0200, Anton Sayetsky wrote:
> 2015-12-07 17:03 GMT+02:00 Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>:
> > ... and a package is what you get by compiling a port.  Yes, there is a
> > difference, but the two things are often conflated and it isn't worth
> > muddying the waters by insisting on exactingly precise terminology from
> > people new to FreeBSD.  It is clear enough what they mean -- their aim
> > is to get some software installed or upgraded.
> But we should warn then about not mixing ports & packages. I agree,
> pkg is a good choice [when pkg only].

That's not a big deal anymore. If you use the default options
for building a port (like those from which the package would
be generated), no precautions are needed. If you use different
options, for only _few_ ports, use "pkg lock" and "pkg unlock".
If you need to compile many ports and still want to use packages,
check out "poudriere". Ports and packages can co-exist happily. :-)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151208062508.31ae2ec2.freebsd>