Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Mar 2002 01:32:35 +1030
From:      Mike Gratton <mike@vee.net>
To:        "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Ugrade from linux-jdk to native
Message-ID:  <3C7E468B.6060005@vee.net>
References:  <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FDA3C7@l04.research.kpn.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Koster, K.J. wrote:
>
> Would you introduce a JIT, saying it is slower than its predecessors? :-)
>

No, I guess not. 8)

I concede your point, but hey, as you yourself said, Hotspot is pretty 
super-duper. I just wish I could remember where I read that about 
Hotspot's performance Vs native C++ - could have been from Sun, the 
original academic papers that were the basis for Hotspot, or [wince] 
sometime on Slashdot.

I don't suppose anyone else here remembers hearing this as well, do they?

-- 
Mike Gratton <mike@vee.net>, <http://web.vee.net/>;
"Every motive escalate."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C7E468B.6060005>