Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 19:50:33 +0100 (MEZ) From: Robert Eckardt <roberte@MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de> To: fullermd@futuresouth.com (Matthew D. Fuller) Cc: dnelson@emsphone.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nice question Message-ID: <199712141850.TAA05329@ghost.mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971214094058.22292B-100000@shell.futuresouth.com> from "Matthew D. Fuller" at "Dec 14, 97 09:48:31 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It was Matthew D. Fuller who wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > Another reason not to use csh :) Csh has a builtin 'nice' command with
> > different arguments than /usr/bin/nice. man csh and search for 'nice'.
> Hmm...
> I use tcsh; would that do it?
> Let's see....
> {~} mortis:{58} %nice 20 top
[..]
> Or, for that matter, shouldn't {t}csh's built-in nice be able to set
> positive priorities somehow? Seems wierd that since root is generally sh,
It does: nice +20 top
> that {t}csh should only allow negative priorities. Or maybe it's just me.
--
Robert Eckardt \\ FreeBSD -- solutions for a large universe.(tm)
RobertE@MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de \\ What do you want to boot tomorrow ?(tm)
http://WWW.MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de/~roberte
For PGP-key finger roberte@gluon.MEP.Ruhr-Uni-Bochum.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712141850.TAA05329>