From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 15:14:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCD51065673; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9A78FC26; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.278.0; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:14:00 -0700 Message-ID: <48874AB6.6080604@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:13:58 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080414) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florent Thoumie References: <1592773212-1216766394-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2001801074-@bxe056.bisx.produk.on.blackberry> <20080723151212.18dfb88d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Olafur Osvaldsson , pgollucci@freebsd.org, Ion-Mihai Tetcu , araujo@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/125625: [PATCH] dns/nsd: USE_RC_SUBR != yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:14:00 -0000 Florent Thoumie wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:08:03 +0100 >> "Florent Thoumie" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Olafur Osvaldsson >>> wrote: >>>> This is something the PR responsible introduced in his original >>>> patch... >>> It's still present in your version. Anyway, I'm not blaming anyone, >>> just pointing out what I think is a mistake. >> So this is not for the user but for the port? >> >> I'll do a swap on the tree for it, because I'm sure there are more >> ports doing something like: >> .ifndef(NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES) >> ...... >> .endif I was talking to itectu@ about this, and figured it would be better in Mk/bsd.port.mk. > The general rule of thumb is: if it doesn't begin with WITH_ or > WITHOUT_, it's not user-settable. NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES is used for > ports using imake that don't understand the install.man target. /me thought that was the USE_ vs WITH(OUT)?_ difference. NO* is supposed to be user settable right ? > > Now of course there are exceptions (usually for no good reason IMHO). > The likes of NOPORTDOCS/NOPORTEXAMPLES/... could be changed to > WITHOUT_DOCS/WITHOUT_EXAMPLES, it's just waiting for somebody to do > the work. Heh, maybe, I kind of feel like it will get reject as a style(9) change. I'm all for it though, not saying I'm going to do it though.