From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 17:17:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A160EAD; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13170F7C; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.100] (c-76-21-10-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.10.192]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01756341F8A2; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:17:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r277694 - head/sys/amd64/conf Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Alfred Perlstein In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:21:34 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201501251202.t0PC2crJ029665@svn.freebsd.org> <6366BFE6-1A9F-433C-99F5-65B9D905AEF5@gmail.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , Sergey Kandaurov , Garrett Cooper , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:17:42 -0000 Don't have a strong opinion on this because I'm not in the know lately, = but was wondering: 1) if we wanted to keep NE1000/2000 support for FreeBSD in emulators? = Probably not I assume? 2) Does Linux nuke these devices? why/why-not? On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >> On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Garrett Cooper = wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Jan 25, 2015, at 04:43, Sergey Kandaurov = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On 25 January 2015 at 15:02, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav = wrote: >>>> Author: des >>>> Date: Sun Jan 25 12:02:38 2015 >>>> New Revision: 277694 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277694 >>>>=20 >>>> Log: >>>> Remove ISA NICs. Anyone still using these on amd64 can build their >>>> own kernel. >>>>=20 >>>> Modified: >>>> head/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC >>>=20 >>> If so, what about i386? (I'd rather not pc98) >>> What about device isa in DEFAULTS? >>=20 >> isa is still needed in some scenarios. I just don't remember the full = details offhand (something about internal buses iirc... And IPMI for = starters...) >=20 > "isa=94 in this context should be read as =93mainbus=94 not as =93ISA = slots=94. You can=92t > remove it without some significant work, and even then the interface = changes > to long established interfaces isn=92t worth the pain. >=20 > Warner >=20 >=20