Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:57:41 +0900
From:      Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h
Message-ID:  <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <200401192127.i0JLRBL3041817@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040120175334.W3279@gamplex.bde.org> <20040213035557.M24031@gamplex.bde.org> <7mfzdexjzs.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:53:25 +1100 (EST),
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I also think that commit is not so useful, but there are some
> > supporters for his modification.  Do you want to back out this
> > completely?   Or fixing just style bugs are acceptable?
> 
> Fixing the style bugs and other bugs, and adding an option (off by
> default) to control it would be acceptable.  Backing it out would
> be easier.

I think an option which is off by default would not be accepted by
Poul-Henning.

I re-read all of this thread and collect opinions.

pls back out:	bde,nate,wpaul,danfe@nsu.ru
good:		phk,kientzle,grog
positive:	silby
negative:	jhb,kuriyama

This does not include private emails to Poul-Henning and I don't think
we should decide something with above.  That's just FYI.

But I personally feel this should be back out after re-reading and we
should tackle traceback() improvements.

Sorry my stupid, but it seems everyone seems happy if traceback()
improvement happens.  Is that really too hard to go forward?


-- 
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
             <kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7m3c99vp6i.wl>