Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:14:25 +0200
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Sol=C3=A8ne_RAPENNE?= <solene@perso.pw>
To:        tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: making a server entirely without X
Message-ID:  <1c471b3f4106a88a12107bc7368cdfd7@mail.zplay.eu>
In-Reply-To: <945bba5d-ffb4-10cb-1467-f1f7ca4d73db@zyxst.net>
References:  <4fe29709-c000-43ac-01c5-38b607887f19@zyxst.net> <2AE900AC-9B5D-42D4-9715-4F7A5FBA6ADA@ohlste.in> <945bba5d-ffb4-10cb-1467-f1f7ca4d73db@zyxst.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2016-07-22 14:54, tech-lists a écrit :
> On 22/07/2016 13:43, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>> On Jul 22, 2016, at 8:38 AM, tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I want to build a server entirely without X. What is the incantation 
>>> for
>>> make.conf please? Or is it incanted elsewhere?
>> 
>> All X components are part of the ports/pkg system. If you don't want 
>> them, don't install them.
> 
> But some ports will build X (or parts of X) as dependencies. Or
> dependencies on dependencies. I want to prevent that. It used to be
> something like WITHOUT_X11=YES in /etc/make.conf but that was a long
> time ago and I think the syntax has changed. I'm looking for the new 
> syntax.

Hello,

You may have problems with some ports if you want to build them without 
X11. I had to remove WITHOUT_X11=yes because of some ports, I don't 
remember their names but they were related to images creation (like 
ImageMagick etc..).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1c471b3f4106a88a12107bc7368cdfd7>