Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:06:34 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Doug Poland <doug@polands.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Apache as reverse SSL proxy Message-ID: <AANLkTimx=dtBuu6djojt_U7hRG_PWn2hrQhsQyi_nqhQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101005035354.GB8662@polands.org> References: <20101004221506.GA8662@polands.org> <AANLkTinCfhmyb1XVXOk4PiSs-MMRPJ4bjvkb6bYiiODJ@mail.gmail.com> <20101005035354.GB8662@polands.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Doug Poland <doug@polands.org> wrote: > What also complicates the matter is that the reverse proxy is supposed > to act for several virtual hosts. The documentation for www/pound > indicated "HTTPS does not allow virtual hosting". I seem to recall > bumping into this issue in the past that one cannot do named-based > vhosts on HTTPS. > > Look like it's back to the drawing board... > You can use nginx and sni to accomplish that, but it depends on browser support. If your viewers are using IE7+, or any other modern browsers it shouldn't be a problem. If you have a lot of IE6- and other old browsers, get those IP request forms filled out. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimx=dtBuu6djojt_U7hRG_PWn2hrQhsQyi_nqhQ>