From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 19:04:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5001065744 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BFE8FC12 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so3686454vws.13 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:04:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GAMmtttRp3WcyqTFQcyIHJumByxrwb9JrB1ynJcrq1w=; b=xbPTdsLd5Vcbl5+FQMckmFW/8Jj40uoz0ubkB4Sl/5a+ScAnNqrXoSNLLkpgXnNApD 6mTaYx9J76cXE8HR3TdEQWGe9bWexpS0o9Rv1BXHe4NV5rd+6nQnON3CvO7kKHctZV2N F/jAKVz3mUf3OnG/jgE5DmgpF0iRb+KNayqEE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=R4buXKoj56AGcCc8FyAT38cSHWU6k6iv+J5czbVCkyJmFOU37kOj99xHb1HDDNyRXv bFBFIoAVEgxqwW4h7XnhREeSyYlCwCHP4ilDFKd/PVuslMfFWpQGGyLKtHWeDJQhNopO rA/kSuNMf0IPxVqKnbur2vTO6CS+Yhhc+j7Sw= Received: by 10.220.59.5 with SMTP id j5mr726300vch.230.1282935878238; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (173-161-130-225-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.161.130.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w31sm2616316vbs.5.2010.08.27.12.04.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C780C43.5010603@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:04:35 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <4C77DB15.5010501@gmail.com> <20100827163310.GD67795@home.opsec.eu> <4C77EBF8.9020405@gmail.com> <20100827165423.GA32102@icarus.home.lan> <4C77F0A9.6030807@gmail.com> <20100827185837.GZ2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20100827185837.GZ2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: security/clamav: Segmentation fault when running clamav in a 32-bit jail on a 64-bit host X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:04:40 -0000 Hello Kostik, On 8/27/10 2:58 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >> Of course. The new backtrace is here: http://gist.github.com/553734 > > I suspect that this was fixed in r210796/HEAD and r211138/RELENG_8. > I will check this out on a test machine. Thanks. >> >>> 2) Was the software rebuilt from source after the upgrade from i386 to >>> amd64, or are you expecting the software to work without any hitches >>> running on amd64 with lib32 (32-bit compatibility libaries)? The latter >>> is not always possible/the case. >>> >> >> clamav was rebuilt from ports. I previously went as far as downgrading >> to the previous version, to rule out something between 0.96.1 and >> 0.96.2; same results there. > > Was clamav rebuilt in the 32-bit jail ? At least your backtrace shows > 32-bit image being executed. > Yes, this is correct. Thanks again, -- Glen Barber