Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Dec 1999 17:22:46 -0800 (PST)
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Ian Struble <ian@broken.net>
Cc:        Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, Alejandro Ramirez <ales@megared.net.mx>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   RE: LBA speed enhancements
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912161720430.4557-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.991216141344.23637a-100000@disavowed.broken.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Ian Struble wrote:

> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Alejandro Ramirez wrote:
> > > > >    Are you refering to the "0xa0ffa0ff" flags???, this flags are for
> > > > >improve performance by enabling DMA use, enable the multi-sector I/O and the
> > > > >32BIT I/O modes to IDE Disks.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, and there is also a bit to set LBA mode.  At least, that's what LINT
> > > > says.
> > > 
> > > The specific flag that Jonathon is talking about is the '1' below.  Using 
> > > it we would have "0xb0ffb0ff" for flags.  Which I can not say that I have 
> > > ever done nor remember seeing anyone else talk about using.
> > 
> > Oh.... I've talked about it, maybe 'talked' is being nice.
> > 
> > I strongly suggest staying away from turning on the LBA modes on
> > drives until the maintainers of the drivers test and announce that
> > it no longer eats disks when doing a crashdump when LBA is active.
> 
> I must have been out of the loop when you 'talked' about it last.  But I 
> don't plan on playing with it untill someone says that it is safe togo 
> back into the pool.  Are you the lifeguard on duty?(ie. the 
> maintainer for the wdc driver)?

No.  

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912161720430.4557-100000>