Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Sep 2016 07:49:15 -0700
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 11.0-RELEASE status update
Message-ID:  <2864250.fYmTXZWezJ@ralph.baldwin.cx>
In-Reply-To: <54d83440-d54d-fe5b-a55e-7fae9dde1ba9@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20160901211000.GZ19112@FreeBSD.org> <20160901211351.GA22212@zxy.spb.ru> <54d83440-d54d-fe5b-a55e-7fae9dde1ba9@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, September 01, 2016 02:22:04 PM Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 9/1/2016 2:13 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:10:00PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> > 
> >> As some of you may be aware, a few last-minute showstoppers appeared
> >> since 11.0-RC1 (and before RC1).
> >>
> >> One of the showstoppers has been fixed in 12-CURRENT, and merged to
> >> stable/11 and releng/11.0 that affected booting from large volumes:
> >>
> >>  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212139
> >>
> >> There is one issue that is still being investigated, which we are
> >> classifying as an EN candidate, given the manifestations of the issue
> >> and reproducibility:
> >>
> >>  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212168
> >>
> >> There is one blocker before 11.0-RELEASE, that affects libarchive, which
> >> we are waiting for feedback.  Once feedback is received, the schedule
> >> for 11.0-RELEASE will be updated on the website to reflect reality.
> >>
> >> There are a few post-release EN items on our watch list as well, so if
> >> something was not mentioned here, that does not mean it will not be
> >> fixed in 11.0-RELEASE.
> >>
> >> Apologies for the delay, and as always, thank you for your patience.
> >>
> >> Glen
> >> On behalf of:	re@
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Do you planed to fix issuse with missied and delete libmap32.conf?
> > 
> 
> This was done intentionally quite a while ago:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=282421
> 
> Though it was later removed from ObsoleteFiles so 'make delete-old'
> would not remove it from users' systems in r282423.
> 
> etcupdate removing it is the problem really being reported here.

Mmm, etcupdate should not remove a modified file.  However, etcupdate
assumes that a file removed from /etc is supposed to be removed.  If
your libmap32.conf is unmodified then it truly is pointless since
/usr/lib32/private doesn't exist anymore in 11.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2864250.fYmTXZWezJ>