Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 21:41:51 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Mikael Karpberg <karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert still broken? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970506214031.4479p-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199705061037.MAA26007@ocean.campus.luth.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 May 1997, Mikael Karpberg wrote: > That doesn't mean that drop isn't a better keyword, and should be made an > alias for deny. Although, if it wasn't for backwards compability (which we > should keep, IMHO) then it would be better with: > > drop : be silent > deny : send RST > reject : send ICMP !H > netreject : send ICMP !N > > But... that's not gonna happen, because we want backwards compability, > so just forget I said it... :-) *laugh* I see what you are saying and No, I don't think we can rearrange the keywords that much. deny/reject/netreject/resest will be it, I think. Danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970506214031.4479p-100000>