From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 18:12:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7483DB0274B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C567E1C7F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 44704 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2016 18:05:49 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 4 Apr 2016 18:05:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:05:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20160404.200549.74712229.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: sodynet1@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of MPLS in FreeBSD From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:12:33 -0000 > Silence means dead project? even the mpls site is dead :( > > linux and openbsd best choices for mpls implementation right now? I'd probably say Juniper and Cisco myself :-) MPLS in FreeBSD is only going to happen if there is sufficient interest *and* coding resources. Somebody needs to do the work. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no