Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:45:32 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacing GNATS? Message-ID: <4ad871310907271745p5414c773u3ae03f22e0746953@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <permail-200907272331361e86ffa800005102-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> References: <permail-200907272331361e86ffa800005102-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Alexander Best<alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> wrote: > i remember reading an interview with a fbsd maintainer where he stated that > nobody's happy with the old GNATS bug tracking system, but since it works > they're keeping it. > > why not move to bugzilla or another bug tracking system? most of them come > with GNATS_2_* scripts. > > switching from cvs to svn (except ports) worked pretty well so why not > continue in that fashion? > Hi, Alexander I don't know if this is what you were referencing about the interview, but there was a funded project announcement in June about this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2009-June/001261.html Just in case that's not what you're referring to. Cheers. (Disclaimer: No, I am not justifying GNATS over Bugzilla, cvs over svn, etc, etc. It was unclear to me if you were referring to the same 'interview', and I thought I would provide a link.) -- Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310907271745p5414c773u3ae03f22e0746953>