From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 17:10:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B63D106566B; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej.zverev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4808FC17; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so2076149vws.13 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DwCBOShatuLS+CJCx1F6HHNY4Hi4+8IHXpjVoNWuYXM=; b=A/u2Htyhg1Ip3+wpbepU0Lq0r8iwN8KoE29iPws6+gQZkAcT/jQnQ049BYnFwBcSty 574Y+6kW4/C5LrnxALUDUluFIbcWK/5vjY5+pb1qG1VQKn3e5DumPDRdmz+2pDf1wNX4 dDQdMvuxLpEBqB4bJcCu2lwjnIBAvOwm7yqtU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=W6gwQPjGQxMwh5fEJy9B/xYqr21OCv2x7JMmLmOVrIKaI6C+sWG8I79RogzONganji 8P92TsKhJ23AE9tukLu58kP0Q7OTFbHKJKkpkbDMFZzsN1p44B4vRJdbzAPyVXnD+nUZ AXFdu/ow1k7tqMVqoJ33HUaI8jaND+iZLOZfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.157.132 with SMTP id wm4mr4337552vdb.221.1298394656695; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: andrej.zverev@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.183.75 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110222165453.GH22667@droso.net> References: <201102220418.p1M4Idj6063729@repoman.freebsd.org> <4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org> <20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com> <4D63DF94.1080209@FreeBSD.org> <20110222165453.GH22667@droso.net> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:10:56 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZcyehhqeY_-F4kyErK8xofp3mRk Message-ID: From: Andrej Zverev To: Erwin Lansing , Greg Larkin , Mark Linimon , Mikhail Teterin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:10:58 -0000 On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: > > On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: > > >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit > > >> has been in the tree for some number of hours? > > > > > > Nope. For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that > > > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong. > > > > > > mcl > > > > What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2, > > or is a PORTEPOCH bump required? > > > Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough. There's no > need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to > upgrade again to +2. PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just > cannot go down. > > -erwin > How about to fix it? :-) > > -- > Erwin Lansing http://droso.org > Prediction is very difficult > especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org >