Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:52:09 -0600
From:      Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r461746 - head/security/ca_root_nss
Message-ID:  <1518799929.3798113.1273296336.4F94C55E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180216174106.125d61af@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
References:  <201802132045.w1DKjdOQ093642@repo.freebsd.org> <20180214141840.583d247a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <1518795735.3761657.1273209560.03AB7B50@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20180216174106.125d61af@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, Feb 16, 2018, at 10:41, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:42:15 -0600 Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018, at 07:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:45:39 +0000 (UTC) Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >>> Modified: head/security/ca_root_nss/pkg-plist
> >>> ==============================================================================
> >>> --- head/security/ca_root_nss/pkg-plist	Tue Feb 13 20:25:50 2018	(r461745)
> >>> +++ head/security/ca_root_nss/pkg-plist	Tue Feb 13 20:45:38 2018	(r461746)
> >>> @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
> >>>  @sample openssl/cert.pem.sample
> >>>  %%ETCSYMLINK%%/etc/ssl/cert.pem
> >>>  %%ETCSYMLINK%%@dir /etc/ssl
> >>> +@postexec [ -x %%LOCALBASE%%/bin/cert-sync ] && %%LOCALBASE%%/bin/cert-sync --quiet %%PREFIX%%/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt
> >> 
> >> This command returns an error if the executable doesn't exist.  You
> >> should invert the logic:
> >> 
> >> @postexec [ ! -x %%LOCALBASE%%/bin/cert-sync ] || %%LOCALBASE%%/bin/
> >> cert-sync --quiet %%PREFIX%%/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt
> > 
> > What did the error look like? I wasn't seeing anything in my testport
> > runs. I intentionally reversed the logic from the original submitter for
> > readability and now feel like a fool.  :-)
> 
> Installing ca_root_nss-3.35_1...
> pkg-static: POST-INSTALL script failed
> 
> Logically, "condition && command" is a conjunction (returns true if both
> sides are true) while "!condition || command" is an implication like "if
> condition then command".  If-then may be more readable though.
> 
> I changed -x to -e because I think it's informative to report an error if
> the command exists but isn't executable.
> 

Thanks. Feedback appreciated.


-- 
  Mark Felder
  ports-secteam & portmgr member
  feld@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1518799929.3798113.1273296336.4F94C55E>