Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:10:59 -0500
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@HiWAAY.net>
To:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:09.signal
Message-ID:  <200308121910.59445.dkelly@HiWAAY.net>
In-Reply-To: <44lltyij8s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030811133518.66226B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3F37D493.9050604@potentialtech.com> <44lltyij8s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 05:49 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> WEP is sufficiently insecure that if and when I get around to using
> wireless at home, I'll need to firewall the wireless net heavily in
> any case.  I may just leave it without WEP for the convenience of
> occasional visitors (as long as I don't notice strangers hopping onto
> it much).

Has been my intent when/if I implement wireless to mandate IPsec and 
forget about WEP.

-- 
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200308121910.59445.dkelly>