Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:22:30 +0200 From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building ports with gcc46 Message-ID: <CALa-7vxfRwhqRcQPATtumfv6YPA5HZ==VqGRKcZw-V2pzJXYPA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwO_mXzUcsWTvn01=uxGg1CgXratdQKDbUYxR-06bha5zg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGFTUwO_mXzUcsWTvn01=uxGg1CgXratdQKDbUYxR-06bha5zg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:05, b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote:
> If you are interested in applying them to a single port, use a test on .CURDIR,
> or, better yet, add the statement to any of the optional Makefiles that are
> automatically included by bsd.port.mk and were intended for that purpose --
> ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile.local, for example.
Unfortunatelly, the Makefile.local included too late for have any
positive/intended effect (e.g. define port-specific WITH/WITHOUT knob,
modify CONFIGURE_ARGS,...) in many cases/ports. Therefore, advise to
use Makefile.local is unreliable. And we left in situation, where
make.conf is the only one reasonable working solution :-(
But yes, it should be properly conditionalized by .if/.endif
--
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALa-7vxfRwhqRcQPATtumfv6YPA5HZ==VqGRKcZw-V2pzJXYPA>