Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:04:33 +0100
From:      Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To:        "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today
Message-ID:  <20080201230433.GA21092@keltia.freenix.fr>
In-Reply-To: <47A3A4A4.1050504@gmail.com>
References:  <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> <20080131110237.06860561@mbook.mired.org> <78cb3d3f0802011434p5bed2b1ex39320962f0bc8bf5@mail.gmail.com> <20080201174850.54fb9dab@bhuda.mired.org> <20080201225622.GA20139@keltia.freenix.fr> <47A3A4A4.1050504@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Aryeh M. Friedman:
> Ports 2.0 is using aegis (aegis.sf.net)... any possibility for wider use?
> Note: I am in the middle of making it FreeBSD friendly and beefing up
> the automated portions of distributed repos

The day it can handle the loads that we have between src and ports, maybe
but I don't think it can reasonably manage 160000 csets...
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
Darwin sidhe.keltia.net Version 8.10.1: Wed May 23 16:33:00 PDT 2007 i386



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080201230433.GA21092>