Date: 11 Dec 2000 18:23:43 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... Message-ID: <xzp8zpmrhwg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:16:46 -0800" References: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org> <xzpelzfxnp9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3A350BFE.BBE81B05@cup.hp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> writes: > But you said it doesn't depend on the Linuxulator. It can therefore be > loaded by itself and used as an alternative for the FreeBSD procfs, > right? Yes, though ps(1) and maybe some others wouldn't like it much. But I'm very soon now going to make linprocfs depend on the Linux module, partly to settle this issue :) and partly so it has access to the compat.linux sysctls (which it needs to produce a meaningful proc/version). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8zpmrhwg.fsf>