From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 11 9:26:22 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 09:26:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3121637B400; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:26:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA56373; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 18:23:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Sender: des@ofug.org X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Peter Wemm , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linprocfs placement... References: <200012110932.eBB9WXK25578@mobile.wemm.org> <3A350BFE.BBE81B05@cup.hp.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Dec 2000 18:23:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:16:46 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marcel Moolenaar writes: > But you said it doesn't depend on the Linuxulator. It can therefore be > loaded by itself and used as an alternative for the FreeBSD procfs, > right? Yes, though ps(1) and maybe some others wouldn't like it much. But I'm very soon now going to make linprocfs depend on the Linux module, partly to settle this issue :) and partly so it has access to the compat.linux sysctls (which it needs to produce a meaningful proc/version). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message