Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:18:52 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/64342: Assumed content of PATH is not defined in Porter's Handbook Message-ID: <1093497532.74916.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200408260413.i7Q4DHi9096740@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200408260413.i7Q4DHi9096740@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-wAKsslX6PnIampUC9fOz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 00:13, Mark Linimon wrote: > Synopsis: Assumed content of PATH is not defined in Porter's Handbook >=20 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->portmgr > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Aug 26 04:12:51 GMT 2004 > Responsible-Changed-Why:=20 > This should be discussed amongst portmgr, it seems. I think it's fair to assume that PATH will be (as it pertains to @[un]exec commands, post-install commands, etc.): /sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin This is what it is set to during package builds on pointyhat, and is a reasonable default. Joe >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D64342 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-wAKsslX6PnIampUC9fOz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBLXK8b2iPiv4Uz4cRAucBAKCsPAkGyjfZIhHaIdg5FNobaTznpACgrcKb 898n54I05nULjB7qjKKlTNQ= =o4rn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wAKsslX6PnIampUC9fOz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1093497532.74916.17.camel>