Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:47:44 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Brandon Falk <falkman@gamozo.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kldload vs Statically compiled in kernel Message-ID: <6201873e1003161847g182d9767sc8cc030dbdf6cf90@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA02466.1070603@gamozo.org> References: <4BA02466.1070603@gamozo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Brandon Falk <falkman@gamozo.org> wrote: > Hello fellow FreeBSD mates, > > I've always statically compiled in my modules into my kernel, rather then > using kldload, or throwing them in /boot/loader.conf. I'm just wondering if > there are actually any advantages to doing it this way. > You get to spend more time with your computer...? ;) No advantage I'm aware of unless you're also removing unnecessary modules then you'd be saving a little disk space and memory. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6201873e1003161847g182d9767sc8cc030dbdf6cf90>