From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 4 16:30:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C6F16A40B; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcoleman@criticalmagic.com) Received: from saturn.criticalmagic.com (saturn.criticalmagic.com [64.74.207.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF9E13C4B7; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcoleman@criticalmagic.com) Received: from rcoleman.acs.internap.com (rcoleman.acs.internap.com [63.251.67.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by saturn.criticalmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCCA3984F; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:59:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Richard Coleman Organization: Critical Magic, Inc. To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:59:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <461217B7.4000409@sofiasoftsolutions.com> <4613A818.20605@my.domain> <4613AE91.80309@mikestammer.com> In-Reply-To: <4613AE91.80309@mikestammer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704041159.10517.rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Anton Blajev , Jona Joachim Subject: Re: cyrus-sasl alternative? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:30:11 -0000 On Wednesday 04 April 2007 09:56:33 am Eric wrote: > > If you also need a POP3/IMAP server you might want to take a look at > > Dovecot. I'm using Dovecot SASL. > > maybe i missed something, but whats wrong with the sasl2 port? isnt that > what most people are using already? I've used both Dovecot and Cyrsus sasl. I would say that Dovecot sasl is much easier to install than Cyrsu sasl. It is implemented as a daemon to which an application communicates via a domain socket rather than as a shared library (which is how Cyrus sasl is implemented). Because of this setup and due to the fact that the configuration is done in a single configuration file, it is more "self contained" from a design perspective. The downsides of Dovecot sasl are: 1) It is not available separately from the Dovecot IMAP/POP server (at the moment) so it makes the most sense for people that are already using Dovecot IMAP/POP. 2) Although Postfix can use Dovecot sasl, it can only use it for server side sasl (although this is not a problem for most sites). But they both work, and there are plenty of people using either one. Richard Coleman rcoleman@criticalmagic.com