From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 5 11:10: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74FB37B479 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id LAA37543; Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:10:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011051910.LAA37543@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Will Andrews Subject: Re: ports/22616: new port of GQmpeg devel Reply-To: Will Andrews Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/22616; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Will Andrews To: lyngbol@candid.dk Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/22616: new port of GQmpeg devel Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 14:06:20 -0500 On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 11:19:49AM +0100, lyngbol@candid.dk wrote: > >Synopsis: new port of GQmpeg (devel version) Is there any decent reason why we can't just merge this into the current version of gqmpeg we have in the tree? I've always been mistrustful of what other developers call ``development'' until I see for myself. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message