Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:53:57 +0200 From: Ian FREISLICH <if@hetzner.co.za> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion Message-ID: <E1Bcjqf-000ERQ-00@hetzner.co.za> In-Reply-To: Message from Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:41:35 %2B0200." <40D81AEF.20579AAC@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andre Oppermann wrote: > > There have been about 5 PRs (most with patches) in the past years > > which all claim to fix this problem indicating that here is a need > > for a fix. We rely on the fix in kern/64240 to collect traffic > > accounting information for billing and statistical purposes. There > > hasn't been much interest from the committers in having a look at > > this even though the work has already been done. > > Could you give me all PR numbers? That'll make it easier for me > get the code in. They all do basically the same thing in varying ways. I think that all except for kern/64240 are against -STABLE. Here's what I can find quickly. There may be more lurking. kern/64240 kern/61259 kern/60377 kern/49959 > > Now that you're actively working on that part of the source, would > > it be possible to take a look? I would also be happy to create a > > new patch to fix this problem against ipfw with pfilhooks if that's > > what it's going to take to get a fix committed. > > It's ok, I don't need new patches against the converted pfil_hooks > code. Cool, thanks. Ian -- Ian Freislich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1Bcjqf-000ERQ-00>