Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 17:22:52 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Oleg Bulyzhin <oleg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.h ip_fw2.c src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw2.c Message-ID: <44747A4C.9090800@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060524131602.GA57006@lath.rinet.ru> References: <200605241309.k4OD9tex003002@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060524131602.GA57006@lath.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 01:09:55PM +0000, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: >> oleg 2006-05-24 13:09:55 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/netinet ip_fw.h ip_fw2.c >> sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw2.c >> Log: >> Implement internal (i.e. inside kernel) packet tagging using mbuf_tags(9). >> Since tags are kept while packet resides in kernelspace, it's possible to >> use other kernel facilities (like netgraph nodes) for altering those tags. >> >> Submitted by: Andrey Elsukov <bu7cher at yandex dot ru> >> Submitted by: Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight at tpu dot ru> >> Approved by: glebius (mentor) >> Idea from: OpenBSD PF >> MFC after: 1 month >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.188 +61 -1 src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 >> 1.89 +72 -8 src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c >> 1.106 +6 -0 src/sys/netinet/ip_fw.h >> 1.132 +57 -1 src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c > > Examples of ipfw rules syntax: > count tag 100 ip from any to any > allow untag 10 ip from any to any tagged 10 Does this accept the packet and untag it at the same time? Wouldn't it make more sense to have [tag|untag] as its own operators like [allow|deny]? > allow tag 200 ip from any to any not tagged 0-65535 > -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44747A4C.9090800>