Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 May 2000 19:36:39 +0100 (BST)
From:      Joao Pedras <jpedras@webvolution.net>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rsh's -t feature
Message-ID:  <XFMail.000501193639.jpedras@webvolution.net>
In-Reply-To: <200005011832.OAA24173@world.std.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
]:)

why do we need to make things so difficult ?

tkx

Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>    I wanted to shutdown a couple machines with a command issued from a third
> which
>    is 'directly' connected to the ups.

> Sure.  That case is easy, especially if they're directly connected to
> each other.  ping a machine, and only try to rsh to it if it responds...


                                          ^\   /^
                                            O O
----------------------------------------o00-(_)-00o--------------------------

Rule of the Great:
        When people you greatly admire appear to be thinking deep
thoughts, they probably are thinking about lunch.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP key available upon request or may be cut at 
http://pedras.webvolution.net/pgpkey.html



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000501193639.jpedras>