From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Oct 19 15:59:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA17218
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 15:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA17206;
          Sat, 19 Oct 1996 15:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA10099; Sat, 19 Oct 1996 16:59:39 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 16:59:39 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199610192259.QAA10099@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Paul Traina <pst@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc: committers@freefall.freebsd.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: xterm termcap definition
In-Reply-To: <199610192248.PAA15990@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199610192248.PAA15990@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Some folks are complaining about the behavior of the nexw xterm definition.
> I've restored us to the ANCIENT X1 0 compatible xterm definition we had
> a week ago. until we get to ghehthe bottom of things, then I'll move us forward
> to the X11R6 compatible definition again. :-(

Thanks!


Nate