From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 14:56:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5197C44C; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEF1616; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2HEuDrp008502; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:56:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r2HEuDQ9008499; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:56:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:56:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: [CFT] New dialog for ports In-Reply-To: <20130314095529.GH53963@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: References: <20130314095529.GH53963@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:56:13 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:56:14 -0000 On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Ilya A. Arkhipov wrote dialog4ports which has just been added into the ports > tree ports-mgmt/dialog4ports, this is intended to be a replacement for dialog(1) > designed specifically for the options, in particular for optionsng. My one complaint is that, last I looked, long option descriptions are not supported. We really need this. A maintainer should be concerned with clear option descriptions and not have to restrict their length at the cost of clarity. The user should not have to interpret short or cut-off option descriptions.