Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:52:34 +0400
From:      Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
To:        Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        www@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cgi/ports.cgi: Last database update
Message-ID:  <51BEDC62.5040904@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20130616210203.GU1692@glenbarber.us>
References:  <51930CFB.3020106@yandex.ru> <20130515125415.GA1635@glenbarber.us> <51BDEE9C.5020705@yandex.ru> <20130616210203.GU1692@glenbarber.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glen Barber wrote on 17.06.2013 01:02:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 08:58:04PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>> Glen Barber wrote on 15.05.2013 16:54:
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:20:11AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> some user on a forum pointed out that freebsd.org's ports tree is
>>>> not updated since 2012-11-11. F.e. I looking for gajim in the ports
>>>> tree:
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=gajim&stype=all&sektion=all
>>>>
>>>> There is the message:
>>>> "Last database update: 2012-11-11 10:45:48 UTC"
>>>>
>>>> And gajim version is at 0.15.2 (while it was already updated to
>>>> 0.15.3_1) and gajim-devel still here.
>>>>
>>>> If I understand correctly, this may be related to CVS-exporter deprecation.
>>>>
>>>> Is this is a known issue and is there any plans to fix that?
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I will take a look at this today.
>>>
>>> Glen
>>
>> Any news?
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay here.
>
> So, there are a few different problems all in this area, that are all
> related to the same underlying infrastructure.  But, here's the short
> version:
>
> I am in the midst of deprecating the machine that used to be responsible
> for doing the doc/www builds (previously known as red.FreeBSD.org).
> Well, to be more clear, it is already (physically) deprecated, but its
> services have been moved to a jail on a different system.
>
> The problem I've run into is that there are a few things that are so
> intertwined, and dependent on the filesystem, that it is actually quite
> much of a mess to untangle.
>
> I have some (I think most) of these running within the new system.
> (These are where some of the random error emails originated a few weeks
> ago, actually.)  But there are still some service-untangling to do.
>
> Some of the filesystem-dependent things appear to use cvs-style
> checkouts of doc/www (meaning, different directories), and I think this
> is the core of the problem with the CGI stuff not working.
>
> Getting this working again is a very high priority for me, but
> unfortunately was out of town last week unexpectedly, so not a whole lot
> of untangling got accomplished.
>
> Once I get the CGI hosting moved from the current setup to the new
> setup, some (if not all) of these website CGI problems should go away as
> a general side effect of the updates.
>
> I hope, worst case, to have everything fully functional on the new
> system within the week.  When this happens, I'll send a heads-up to
> ops-announce@ mailing list, since I found with the last move that some
> things did unexpectedly break, so while I can test the majority of the
> services provided here, I likely will miss something.
>
> I know it is not the answer you wanted to hear.  But I am working on it,
> and just need a bit more time to make sure I do not break everything,
> since there are a lot of interdependencies here.
>
> Glen

Thank you for such an extended response, Glen. Feel free to ping me if 
you need any help with testing of the new setup (from web-user point of 
view).

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51BEDC62.5040904>