From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 21:58:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBDD16A473 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from smtp.ht-systems.ru (mr0.ht-systems.ru [78.110.50.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288CA13C458 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@ht-systems.ru) Received: from [78.110.49.49] (helo=quasar.ht-systems.ru) by smtp.ht-systems.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1J4Nyc-0002Vt-0Z; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:58:18 +0300 Received: by quasar.ht-systems.ru (Postfix, from userid 1024) id E57877D2803; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:58:16 +0300 (MSK) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:58:16 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20071217215816.GE86893@dracon.ht-systems.ru> References: <47629E53.30404@semihalf.com> <20071214190825.GG17356@dracon.ht-systems.ru> <4766E845.50304@semihalf.com> <20071217.144000.31317558.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071217.144000.31317558.imp@bsdimp.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Yahoo: stanislav_sedov X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-University: MEPhI X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon X-Operating-System: FreeBSD quasar.ht-systems.ru 7.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MMC cards support X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:58:21 -0000 On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:40:00PM -0700 M. Warner Losh mentioned: > > Hmmm, We got a patch to look at all the SAxL/H pairs for an address. > I thought it was crazy to do that, but if uboot does this for some > reason, then I'll be the first to admit that I was wrong and add the > extra bits back. > Probably we can look MAC in higher registers, if lower didn't contained valid one. I need to check if u-boot really does this first, though. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE