Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 06:55:46 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r266865 - in head: include include/xlocale lib/libc/string Message-ID: <DE90502F-99FC-40CA-BAEA-F66C8A3EE9CF@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <7AFBC7BD-9F6F-44AA-BBAE-B4A1B20E9B02@felyko.com> References: <201405300109.s4U197Ox028750@svn.freebsd.org> <7AFBC7BD-9F6F-44AA-BBAE-B4A1B20E9B02@felyko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Il giorno 30/mag/2014, alle ore 00:18, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> ha = scritto: > On May 29, 2014, at 18:09, Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 >> Author: pfg >> Date: Fri May 30 01:09:07 2014 >> New Revision: 266865 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266865 >>=20 >> Log: >> Fix strcasecmp_l() and strncasecmp_l() POSIX 2008 compliance. >>=20 >> POSIX.1-2008 specifies that those two functions should be declared by >> including <strings.h>, not <string.h> (the latter only has = strcoll_l() >> and strxfrm_l()): >>=20 >> = http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/strcasecmp.html >=20 > Is this going to cause any ports fallout? >=20 I consider this a bug fix; I think ports should already be respecting = standards. Should I consider a FreeBSD_version bump JIC? Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DE90502F-99FC-40CA-BAEA-F66C8A3EE9CF>